DHS Announces Closure of Two Detention Facilities | Joseph & Hall P.C.

[ad_1]

On Might 20, 2021, Alejandro Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Safety, directed ICE to instantly discontinue the usage of an immigration detention facility in North Dartmouth, Massachusetts and put together to discontinue the usage of one other detention facility in Ocilla, Georgia. Each amenities have been on the heart of controversy in latest months. On the Massachusetts facility, the Massachusetts Legal professional Basic discovered the sheriff’s workplace used extreme power, together with flash-bang grenades, pepper-ball launchers, and canines, towards detainees when a conflict broke out over COVID-19 testing. And on the Ocilla, Georgia facility, quite a few detainees got here ahead to report {that a} gynecologist who labored at facility carried out pointless and undesirable procedures on them, together with hysterectomies.

In his directive to shut these amenities, Secretary Mayorkas remarked, “Enable me to state one foundational precept: we is not going to tolerate the mistreatment of people in civil immigration detention or substandard circumstances of detention.”

The closure of those amenities highlights the problematic nature our immigration detention system and begs the query of whether or not immigration detention is even essential. Whereas immigration detention is claimed to be “civil” slightly than “prison,” in apply immigration detainees are confined in jail-like settings.

A typical argument in help of immigration detention amenities is that it ensures immigrants attend their court docket hearings. Nevertheless, latest studies point out that the “downside” of immigrants failing to look for court docket hearings is comparatively small, and infrequently could be attributed to lack of discover or challenges in attending to court docket. A latest report revealed by the American Immigration Council analyzed a decade of information offered by the federal authorities and located:

  • 83% of all non-detained immigrants with accomplished or pending elimination circumstances from FY08-18 attended all of their court docket hearings.
  • 95% of non-detained immigrants represented by a lawyer attended their court-hearings

The closure of two detention amenities is a constructive growth, and hopefully will spur on the conversations concerning options to detention.

[ad_2]

Source link

The Editor

Recent Posts

New Immigration Pathways in Europe: A Breakdown of Digital Nomad Visas

The rise of remote work has paved the way for digital nomad visas, offering professionals…

1 month ago

Family Reunification Policies: How Different Countries Approach Visa Delays and Backlogs

Visa delays and backlogs have long been a challenge for families seeking reunification, and the…

1 month ago

Student Visa Changes in 2024: Key Updates in the US, Canada, Australia, and the UK

Student visa policies in the US, Canada, Australia, and the UK have seen significant changes…

1 month ago

The Impact of Global Inflation on Immigrant Communities

As global inflation continues to rise, immigrant communities are disproportionately affected. In many countries, the…

1 month ago

Climate Refugees: The Growing Role of Climate Change in Immigration Policy

Climate change is increasingly driving migration, with rising sea levels, severe droughts, and catastrophic weather…

1 month ago

Top Countries with Investor Visa Programs in 2024: Requirements and Benefits

Investor visa programs offer pathways to residency or citizenship in exchange for significant financial investment,…

1 month ago