Who Loves a Good Mystery? The Death of King Ludwig II Reconsidered by a Forensic Economist, Part 5

[ad_1]

Concurring and Supporting Proof

The Artwork World enters our story with proof that counters the official reason behind Ludwig’s loss of life. Seigfried Wichmann is acknowledged because the main authority on Bavarian work from the late nineteenth century. In 2008, Wichmann revealed {a photograph} of a autopsy portrait painted inside hours after the loss of life of the king that exhibits blood oozing from the nook of his mouth. Although not a medical physician, Wichmann survived the same wound from shrapnel that entered his lung whereas he fought within the Second World Struggle. He asserts that the blood within the portray would have come from the lungs. Nonetheless, the thick blood portrayed within the portray exhibits no indicators of water. As well as, Wichmann claims that the portrait options no indication of rigor mortis and that the mouth is agape. This proof contradicts the official post-mortem report in respect to the water and the official declare that Ludwig died at 6:54 PM, the time that his watch stopped. Due to this fact, I (Dr. Sase) would request an extra opinion from a medical professional in an effort to help this assertion.

In the identical 12 months as Wichmann’s declare, the Bavarian banker Detlev Utermohle got here ahead and gave a sworn affidavit that he had seen the gray Loden coat worn by Ludwig on the night of the tragedy. The coat contained two bullet holes within the again. On the time, Utermohle was ten years previous. He and his mom had visited the house of Countess Josephine von Wrba-Kaunitz, who taken care of among the belongings of the Wittelsbach household. The Countess had the coat with two bullet holes in her possession. Sadly for the world of forensic science, the coat was misplaced after the fireplace that destroyed the house and killed each Countess Wrba-Kaunitz and her husband in 1973.

An Eyewitness Report?

The proof asserted within the sworn affidavit concurs with one other surviving file of the occasions at Lake Starnberg on 13 June 1886. A handwritten assertion by Jakob Lidl, the non-public fisherman of King Ludwig, tells a narrative opposite to the official assertion. Lidl’s notes, which had been discovered after his loss of life in 1933, state that he noticed the homicide of Ludwig together with his personal eyes. As Ludwig stepped onto the boat, a shot rang out from the shore. The king fell throughout the bow of the boat.

Three years after the incident, the State of Bavaria made Lidl swear an oath to not reveal what he heard and noticed to his spouse, his priest, or anybody else. In return for his compliance, the State agreed to take care of his household if something ought to ever occur to him in warfare or peace.

[ad_2]

Source by John F Sase